A California jury has discovered Meta in violation of state consumer privateness legal guidelines in a class-action swimsuit introduced by customers of interval monitoring app, Flo, who alleged that the tech big collected non-public menstrual well being knowledge with out customers’ consent and used it for ad-tracking functions.
The plaintiffs, claiming to characterize tens of millions of Flo customers, had accused Flo and Meta of accumulating non-public well being knowledge, like their interval dates and fertility objectives, through Flo’s app with out permission, due to this fact violating California Invasion of Privateness Act.
Filed in 2021 in opposition to Flo, the lawsuit additionally named Meta, Google, and advert analytics corporations AppFlyers and Flurry, as defendants, although Google settled the case in July, and Flo additionally did so earlier this month.
“This verdict sends a transparent message in regards to the safety of digital well being knowledge and the obligations of Massive Tech,” stated Michael P. Canty and Carol C. Villegas, lead trial attorneys within the case.
“Corporations like Meta that covertly revenue from customers’ most intimate info should be held accountable. At this time’s end result reinforces the elemental proper to privateness—particularly in relation to delicate well being knowledge,” they added.
Meta disagreed with the decision and stated that the corporate by no means eavesdropped on Flo customers.
“We vigorously disagree with this end result and are exploring all authorized choices. The plaintiffs’ claims in opposition to Meta are merely false. Person privateness is necessary to Meta, which is why we are not looking for well being or different delicate info, and why our phrases prohibit builders from sending any,” an organization spokesperson stated in a press release.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Final 12 months, Flo raised $200 million in Collection C funding from Basic Atlantic at a valuation of over $1 billion.